h1

The LDs overturn Zac’s 23k majority with a lead of 1,872

December 2nd, 2016

Sarah Olney (LD) 20,510 (49.68%, +30.41%)

Zac Goldsmith (Ind) 18,638 (45.15%)

Christian Wolmar (Lab) 1,515 (3.67%, -8.68%)

Howling Laud Hope (Loony) 184 (0.45%)

Fiona Syms (Ind) 173 (0.42%)

Dominic Stockford (CPA) 164 (0.40%)

Maharaja Jammu and Kashmir (Love) 67 (0.16%)

David Powell (ND) 32 (0.08%)

LD maj 1,872 (4.53%)

Zac’s gamble fails

That’s a fantastic result for the yellows and a tragic result for Zac Goldsmith who, of course, was beaten in the London Mayoral race last May.

The seat has, of course, been LD territory in the past and the party has flung everything at it. This has been a huge campaign which I said at the start was an absolute must win for them.

The result cuts Theresa May’s majority by 2 to a theoretical 10.

There was much scepticism when the LDs produced vote projections in the past few days showing they were in the lead. Well these have been proved right.

Mike Smithson





h1

At the moment (0043 GMT) punters think that the LDs will win

December 2nd, 2016



h1

Tonight’s local and Westminster by-election preview

December 1st, 2016

rp

Richmond Park (Ind defence, elected as Conservative) to Westminster Parliament
Result of Parliament at last election (2015): Conservatives 331, Labour 232, Scottish National Party 56, Northern Ireland Parties 18, Liberal Democrats 8, Plaid Cymru 3, Green Party 1, United Kingdom Independence Party 1 (Conservative majority of 12)
Result of constituency at last election (2015): Conservative 34,404 (58%), Liberal Democrat 11,389 (19%), Labour 7,296 (12%), Green Party 3,548 (6%), United Kingdom Independence Party 2,464 (4%)
EU Referendum Result (Borough): REMAIN 75,396 (69%) LEAVE 33,410 (31%) on a turnout of 82%
Estimated Vote in constituency: REMAIN 72%, LEAVE 28%
Candidates duly nominated: Zac Goldsmith (Ind), Alan Hope (Loony), Ankit Love (One Love), Sarah Olney (Lib Dem), David Powell (Non Party Independent), Dominic Stockford (Christian People’s Alliance), Fiona Syms (Independent Conservative), Christian Wolmar (Lab)

Southbourne (Con defence) on Chichester
Reult of council at last election (2015): Conservatives 42, Liberal Democrats 3, Independents 3 (Conservative majority of 36)
Result of ward at last election (2015): Emboldened denotes elected
Conservatives 1,994, 1,865, 1,847 (58%)
Liberal Democrats 1,437, 914, 878 (42%)
EU Referendum Result: REMAIN 35,011 (49%) LEAVE 36,326 (51%) on a turnout of 78%
Candidates duly nominated: Jonathan Brown (Lib Dem), Rebecca Hamlet (Lab), David Harwood (Con), Patricia Hunt (UKIP)

Ferndown (UKIP defence) on Dorset
Result of council at last election (2013): Conservatives 26, Liberal Democrats 12, Labour 5, United Kingdom Independence Party 1 (Conservative majority of 8)
Result of ward at last election (2013): Emboldened denotes elected
United Kingdom Independence Party 2,222, 2,027 (44%)
Conservatives 2,187, 2,085 (45%)
Labour 567, 466 (11%)
EU Referendum Result (County): REMAIN 191,792 (43%) LEAVE 249,517 (57%) on a turnout of 76%
Candidates duly nominated: Jason Jones (Lib Dem), Andrew Parry (Con), Peter Stokes (Lab), Lawrence Wilson (UKIP)

Grange Park (Con defence) on South Northamptonshire
Reult of council at last election (2015): Conservatives 35, Liberal Democrats 4, Independents 3 (Conservative majority of 28)
Result of ward at last election (2015): Emboldened denotes elected
Conservatives 1,459, 1,032 (71%)
Labour 584 (29%)
EU Referendum Result: REMAIN 25,853 (46%) LEAVE 30,771 (54%) on a turnout of 79%
Candidates duly nominated: Andy Clarke (Green), Rose Gibbins (UKIP), Andrew Grant (Con), Ian Grant (Lab)

Whitechapel (Ind defence, elected as Tower Hamlets First) on Tower Hamlets
Result of council at last election (2014): Labour 20, Tower Hamlets First 18, Conservatives 4 (No Overall Control, Labour short by 2)
Result of ward at last election (2014): Emboldened denotes elected
Tower Hamlets First 2,139, 2,117, 2,088 (40%)
Labour 1,359, 1,190, 1,188 (26%)
Green Party 703 (13%)
Conservatives 409, 405, 345 (8%)
Liberal Democrats 358 (7%)
United Kingdom Independence Party 199 (4%)
Trade Unionist and Socialist 139 (3%)
EU Referendum Result: REMAIN 73,011 (68%) LEAVE 35,224 (32%) on a turnout of 65%
Candidates duly nominated: Shafi Ahmed (Ind), Emanuel Andjelic (Lib Dem), Will Fletcher (Con), Victoria Obaze (Lab), Martin Smith (UKIP), James Wilson (Green)

Myton and Heathcote (Con defence) on Warwick
Reult of council at last election (2015): Conservatives 31, Labour 9, Independents 3, Liberal Democrats 2, Green Party 1 (Conservative majority of 16)
Result of ward at last election (2015): Emboldened denotes elected
Conservatives 1,286, 1,252 (44%)
Independents 440, 370 (15%)
Liberal Democrat 431 (15%)
Green Party 427, 383 (14%)
United Kingdom Independence Party 374 (13%)
EU Referendum Result: REMAIN 47,976 (59%) LEAVE 33,642 (41%) on a turnout of 79%
Candidates duly nominated: Parminder Birdi (Con), Kelvin Lambert (Lib Dem), John Sullivan (Lab)

Compiled by Harry Hayfield



h1

New entrant Ed Balls moves immediately to 3rd place in latest YouGov favourability ratings

December 1st, 2016

Both Theresa May & Corbyn see drops

Here they are – the latest YouGov favourability ratings, the polling where the site has chosen who/what should be included.

The first time we did this was in August and since then all the UK politicians have seen net drops. Ed Balls, included after his Strictly successes, was not part of the August list.

In the summer TMay was still enjoying her honeymoon and had a net +12%. That’s now down to +5% with 46% favourable to 41% unfavourable. Boris has seen a decline from -5% in August to -13% now (38-51). Meanwhile, just on his heels, comes Strictly star Ed Balls with 32-47%. So he’s in negative territory but nothing like as bad as Mr. Corbyn who has 26-51 representing a net move since last time of minus 10.

Tony Blair might be thinking of some sort of UK come-back but his ratings, 14-74 are awful and he is only just ahead of Putin and Trump.

Donald Trump gets the best numbers from GE2015 UKIP voters who split 45% to 49%. They also have the most favourable view of Mr. Putin.

Mike Smithson




h1

Whatever the outcome tonight Richmond Park could herald a political period where BREXIT is more important than parties

December 1st, 2016

111201681952

Would the Tories stand aside in a seat where UKIP was 2nd behind LAB

.
Today’s Richmond Park by-election highlights a very new development in British politics where the main issue of the day, BREXIT and its implementation, have become more important than parties.

UKIP’s decision to stand aside in Richmond Park as well as the similar move by the Greens on the other side of the argument could mark something very different from what we are used to.

At GE2015 UKIP was runner up in 120 seats most which were held by Labour. If one of those came up could you see the Tories being ready to stand aside to give UKIP a better chance of defeating LAB?

It makes a lot of sense just as in Richmond Park where Greens decided to back the REMAIN contender most likely to beat the pro BREXIT incumbent. One of the stories of the campaign has been the pressure on LAB following its decision to field a candidate in a seat where they’ve failed to do better than third for several decades.

A poor LAB vote share would focus fresh attention on the decision and could impact on future contests.

The winner tonight, whoever it is, will have done so partly because other parties didn’t put up a candidate. I hope the victor acknowledges this in his/her speech.

Mike Smithson




h1

The Lib Dems could be making a massive mistake claiming they’re on target to win Richmond Park tomorrow

November 30th, 2016

1030201616126
The Guardian

What would be good result getting very close will be seen as a failure

The big news on this final day of campaigning in the Richmond Park by-election is that the Lib Dems are claiming that they are ahead.

According to data made available to the Guardian the party’s current projection is:

Goldsmith 45.8%
LIB Dems 47.2%
LAB 6.2%

As I’ve argued previously you should treat all data like this as coming from a partisan source and should be regarded with great scepticism. We are being told this for a reason.

I must admit that I am somewhat astounded. If they come very close tomorrow then that could be seen as a failure not a good result given that Zac is defending a 23k majority.

We also know that MPs who resign to fight by-elections have a very good track record with only one failure in the last third of a century. Zac has a huge incumbency benefit.

There’s also the issue of credibility in the future. If the LDs lose then this will be quoted back at them for decades.

Maybe the idea is to fire up their huge activist base for the critical get out the vote operation but surely the same could be achieved by simply suggesting that this is very close.

Mike Smithson




h1

TMay moves to negative ratings in Scotland while fewer Scots now back independence than at the 2014 referendum

November 30th, 2016

first-minister-hosts-prime-minister-theresa-may-youtube

Given the huge importance of Scotland as the UK moves towards BREXIT there’s a new Scotland only YouGov poll – the first since August.

These are some of the key points:-

The rise and rise of Scots CON leader Ruth Davidson continues

Scottish Greens now into double figures on Regional List voting



h1

On top of LAB polling woes first analysis of the new boundaries suggests LAB will need vote lead of 13.5% to get a majority

November 29th, 2016

Bling 2

The Tories only need a 1.9% margin

YouGov’s Anthony Wells who runs UK Polling Report had produced his first analysis of the planned new boundary changes and the outcome is excellent for the Tories and terrible for Labour.

The analysis also has the LDs down to just four MPs.

I’m just on my way home from the Political Studies Association Awards in London and I’ll do more on this when I’ve had time to look at this in greater detail.

Mike Smithson