Archive for the 'Coalition' Category

h1

Local By-Election Results: July 2nd 2015

Friday, July 3rd, 2015

Grantham, Barrowby on Lincolnshire (Con defence)
Result: Conservative 579 (50% +12%), Labour 257 (22% -8%), UKIP 179 (15%, no candidate in 2013), Lincolnshire Independents 155 (13%, no candidate in 2013)
Conservative HOLD with a majority of 322 (28%) on a swing of 10% from Labour to Conservative

Hampton Wick on Richmond upon Thames (Con defence)
Result: Liberal Democrat 1,189 (43% +25%), Conservative 1,081 (39% -11%), Green 237 (9% -10%), Labour 185 (7% -7%), UKIP 69 (3%, no candidate in 2014), Independent 7 (0%, no candidate in 2014)
Liberal Democrat GAIN from Conservative with a majority of 108 (4%) on a swing of 18% from Conservative to Liberal Democrat



h1

Local By-Election Result : June 30th 2015

Wednesday, July 1st, 2015

Result: Conservative 561 (40% -14%), Plaid 543 (39% +27%), Labour 234 (17% -12%), Independent 24 (2%, no candidate in 2012), Green Party 22 (2% -1%), Liberal Democrats 10 (1% -1%)
Conservative HOLD with a majority of 18 (1%) on a swing of 21% from Conservative to Plaid



h1

Marf on Osborne’s plan for the civil service

Thursday, May 21st, 2015

cutsosborne15

PB Update – welcome to Don Brind

Tomorrow the political journalist, Don Brind, is joining our small team of regular guest slot contributors. He is somebody I’ve known a very long time since we both worked at the BBC in the 1970s. In recent times Don has been a regular contributor on The Week

Back in 2007 Don gave me a well argued steer on the then LAB deputy leadership contest to the effect that Harriet Harman, then 10/1, was going to get it. She won.

He’s got very close contacts with LAB and will act as a balance to David Herdson and TSE who are both active Tories. His first column will be tomorrow.

Mike Smithson





h1

Marf on the LAB leadership as Liz Kendall gets closer in the betting

Monday, May 18th, 2015

andyburnhamentersring

According to Huffington post the move by UNITE to get behind Andy Burnham might be back-backfiring.

“Backers of Liz Kendall are hoping that an influx of new party members and supporters will wrest control of the Labour leadership race back from Len McCluskey.

The Unite general secretary is facing a backlash from MPs and local constituency parties after threatening to axe his union’s link with Labour unless the party chose “the correct leader”…

..More than 30,000 people have joined Labour as full members since the general election defeat, adding to the already 200,000-strong rank and file eligible to vote in the leadership race.

Under new one-member, one-vote rules, individual members and supporters are eligible to take part in the election even if they joined just two days before the ballot opens on August 14. Previous strict rules on a lengthy qualifying period of membership have been overhauled in a bid to attract new blood.”

Remember this election will go on until September 12th. There is a long way to go.

My instinct is that those contenders associated with the last LAB government could be at a disadvantage as the party takes full stock of its defeat.

Mike Smithson





h1

Marf on the LAB leadership

Friday, May 15th, 2015

bitesthedust (1)



h1

The likely final polls with when we can expect them

Monday, May 4th, 2015



If I’ve made a mistake or you have better info then please email me
ASAP.

Mike Smithson

For 11 years viewing politics from OUTSIDE the Westminster bubble




h1

David Herdson: The election remains far from a foregone conclusion

Saturday, May 2nd, 2015

Polling+station+cyclist (1)

Groupthink can be a most dangerous thing. To listen to many commentators, analysts and indeed many politicians, such is the consensus that you might believe that the election was all over and the result in; that result being Con and Lab roughly level, an SNP landslide in Scotland, the Lib Dems parliamentary party halved and UKIP and the Greens failing to register meaningfully. So it might be but we should at least entertain other possibilities.

Why has such a consensus developed? Much of it is surely due to the monotony of the YouGov and Populus poll results, the most frequent pollsters and also the most stable in output. The result is that that each additional poll reinforces confidence that they must be right and hence gives an impression of where the election’s heading. In a similar vein, if everyone interprets those polls in the same way then ‘most likely’ tends towards the apparently inevitable simply by reaffirmation.

Yet elections are not that predictable. Late swings can occur but in current circumstances, more likely is that opinion is being misread – or more accurately, the wrong polls are being dismissed. So what could go wrong?

The Tories do much better than anticipated

The assumption is that it’s currently very tight in the national polls with a point or so either way. Maybe so but there have been several polls in April that generated very different results. Mori, Opinium, ICM, ComRes (phone), Survation and Ashcroft have all reported Tory leads of 4% or more at some point. You would not expect that many polls so top-side for the Cons if the actual lead was only 1% just on natural fluctuation. Sampling might still be the explanation (there is always a slim chance of the improbable), or the methodologies may be out but there is a third option: that they’re right. Just because something appears to be rogue doesn’t mean it is – particularly if several pollsters find it.

Labour does much better than expected

Unlike the Tories, Labour hasn’t chalked up any six-point leads recently. Unlike the Tories, it doesn’t need to. Even allowing for a cataclysm reducing Scottish Labour to single figures (and everything over the last six months points to that being the very best they can hope for), the online polls suggest a swing to Labour in England of at least 4%. On top of that, as Mike noted yesterday, there’s some evidence that Labour is doing disproportionately well at picking up ex-LD votes in the marginals. While seat-specific polling is more patchy, single-constituency polls are a new discipline and have not always proven particularly accurate in the past. A Labour lead in England (which is what a 2% GB-wide lead would imply) should see Labour some way over 300 seats and probably capable of forming a government with the Lib Dems. Unless …

The Lib Dems do catastrophically

Everyone expects the Lib Dems to do badly. More than four years of election results and polling point to it and nothing’s changed to reassess that expectation. Yes, they did hold the one parliamentary by-election they defended but only by the quirk of a particularly split opposition. Their trump card has always been assumed to be incumbency; their cockroach-like survival abilities, as Tim Farron once put it. However, they look doomed in most of their Scottish seats, will struggle mightily where facing Labour and could be faring just as badly in the South West. If so, the ‘third force’ in British politics could easily be looking at their smallest Westminster presence since the SDP-Liberal Alliance formed in 1981 (as well as having been relegated to fourth).

Where does any of that leave us? What seems certain is that there will be no outright winner; the SNP sweep seems to make that all but certain given that there will likely be a minimum of 90 non-Con/Lab MPs and possibly quite a few more. What we shouldn’t assume however is that the SNP will necessarily have the power they’re anticipating (though if they find they don’t, another independence referendum becomes almost inevitable within five years and probably three).

David Herdson

p.s. Mike put up a thread earlier this week based on Sporting Index’s market on big-name casualties which got me thinking about this year’s Portillo Moment: the defining image of the election. Not all elections have them and they’re far from all the same. In 1992, it was the government holding Basildon that became iconic; in 1983 it was a member of the opposition – Tony Benn – losing that marked the failure of Labour in general and the far left in particular.

This time, in line with the comments in the main thread, many eyes will be turned to Sheffield Hallam if the Lib Dems do have a desperate night, or Morley & Outwood if the Tories perform unexpectedly well. However the most extraordinary events are likely to take place in Scotland and while Jim Murphy’s own East Renfrewshire seat should be a contender for the Portillo Moment, as should the Kirkaldy & Cowdenbeath one of former PM Gordon Brown, neither feels quite right to me. If anything, the prominence of their former MPs detracts from the phenomenon their change of allegiance would represent. More appropriate might be Glasgow North East, anonymously symbolic of an utterly dominant Scottish Labour machine. Labour has never failed to win less than 53% in it or its predecessors since before WWII and has frequently polled two-thirds or more. That, and a 7% lead in a January constituency poll, explains why the SNP are still odds-against at 13/8. But if Sturgeon’s army can take it, nothing would symbolize their national triumph more.



h1

Both Farage and Clegg set to lose according to new Ashcroft polling

Wednesday, April 29th, 2015

Clegg trailing in Hallam even though a third of 2010 CON voters not supporting him

Farage’s battle remains tight

South Swindon – LAB CON target number 43