h1

ICM moves into the mobile age

March 1st, 2012

What’ll this do to VI figures?

ICM, which in 1995 became the first UK polling firm to mount political surveys by phone, announced this afternoon that from the March poll for the Guardian about 150 of the 1000 interviews will be achieved via interviews on mobile phones.

This is in response to the decline in proportion on the population who have land-lines and the increasing difficulty reaching young voters particularly young men.

According to research by Ofcom 32% of those in the 18-24 age bracket are only accessible via their personal mobile phone.

It’s believe that this is another first for ICM which has built up a reputation for pioneering polling techniques.

The firm is hoping that this latest move will make its samples more representative and more accurate.

An issue if a pollster cannot find enough people in a particular demographic is that the views of those whom they do manage to talk to have to be scaled up thus increasing the chance of error.

In tests ICM has found that when rung, mobile phones will be less likely to be answered than landlines, but people on mobiles will be more likely to complete an interview if the firm gets through to them. The standard refusal rate for landlines is running at 10.8%. For mobiles the firm is finding that just 3.4% won’t take part.

We’ll be monitoring ICM very closely in the coming months to see if this does make a difference.

@MikeSmithsonOGH




  • http://tomknoxbooks.com SeanT

    Whatever. My point is still good. If you really wanna argue this I can cite you zillions of American surveys that prove the same: areas of high immigration tend to be unhappier, even when adjusted for per capita wealth.

    Moreover, people will cluster in racially similar areas, i.e. move to neighborhoods full of people like themselves, if they possibly can.

    Immigration = unhappy native poor people, but happy businessmen and employers. It is therefore odd that the left promulgates it so assiduously.

  • Ishmael_X

    “But why on earth do lefties so rapturously favour immigration?”

    Because they think exactly like in 1984. The only crime is thoughtcrime – in this case racism. Immigration is good only in that it enables, and therefore leads to an opportunity for the good citizen to denounce, thoughtcrime.

    tim and P0rk’s motto – tough on thoughtcrime, tough on the causes of thoughtcrime.

  • http://tomknoxbooks.com SeanT

    The unhappiest northern towns on the list are..

    Oldham, Blackburn and Bradford.

    You really wanna have this debate?

    lol

  • Anonymous

    “Missed the Scotland Thread this morning”
    It was a corker!  The Nats wanted to talk about anything other than the topic in hand ‘How will Salmond reassure over economic uncertainty’ – no answer – tho interesting discussions on ‘inhumane’ vs ‘humane’ weapons, that the typical SNP member is a 63 year old man who takes insults to Scotland as personal and disagrees with SNP policy on leaving NATO and keeping the monarchy….

  • Anonymous

    Labour ties to Murdoch do not exist , and never existed.  Come on – stop pretending otherwise. Tim is always right – and lets face it he is incredibly clever and witty at the same time.

  • old_labour

    What is it with Mr Cameron and animals?  Larry should be very afraid.

    David Cameron was accused tonight of deploying “smoke and mirrors” to
    avoid imposing an immediate ban on wild animals in travelling circuses.

    The Government announced plans for a licensing regime to monitor
    animals’ well-being as a precursor for outlawing their use entirely.

    But
    to the dismay of animal rights campaigners and MPs of all parties, it
    was unable to give a firm date for when a ban would be implemented.

    MPs
    unanimously voted in favour of the move last year and surveys also
    suggest an overwhelming majority of the public wants the practice
    outlawed. More than 30,000 people signed an Independent petition last year calling for a ban.

    The
    Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)
    initially supported the move, but was overruled by David Cameron…

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/cameron-accused-of-smoke-and-mirrors-over-circus-animals-ban-7467735.html

  • Anonymous

    “Eurovision surprise: Engelbert Humperdinck is UK entry”

    Flogging a dead horse?

    This is either brilliant – or completely bonkers…..

  • Anonymous

    Have you ever heard of the UN non proliferation treaty?

  • Anonymous
  • old_labour

    I wonder what the betting odds would have been for Engelbert Humperdinck. Never mind a horse, I want a Tardis.

  • Anonymous

    In bradford right now,they is a big influx of people from eastern Europe,can I just get this down before it happens,how long before a council say they cannot cope with the mass migration to they cities and towns – housing,schools,nhs and how much a council can afford.

    sorry it has nothing to do with most post on here,thought I can claim this subject when it happens ;-)

  • old_labour

    The coalition must be safe. William Rees-Mogg thinks it could topple, according to the Times’ homepage.

  • Anonymous

    ‘where’ or ‘why’?…

    I have never heard such bunkum rubbish in my life.  I admit I have only ever ridden a donkey on Blackpool beach 55 years ago. Nevertheless I am prepared to believe that not everybody who jumps onto a friend’s horse is as obsessive as you.  Its a slight possibility not to be frivolously discounted that someone might not have been paying too much attention.  After all this is Tim’s never ending claim.

  • Anonymous

    I honestly thought he was dead. Delighted to be wrong of course.

  • Anonymous

    Look – Tim is very very funny and clever with it.

  • Anonymous

    Oldham’s a dump, Bradford’s a dump. Never been to Blackburn.

  • Freggles

    Yes, please explain how it doesn’t apply to USA helping Israel or Pakistan get nuclear weapons but it does apply to Iran.

    It also commits the nuclear states to disarm.

  • Anonymous

    Beyond the general good will and bonhomie of today, not really…

    Oh, apparently, is the biggest political story of the day.  Not Iran, not the Eurozone, not tax rates… no a horse.

  • Anonymous

    No. I’m saying I can’t be certain they wouldn’t. And where nukes are concerned, that sort of uncertainty is rather uncomfortable.

  • MickP0rk

     “It was a corker!  The Nats wanted to talk about anything other than the
    topic in hand ‘How will Salmond reassure over economic uncertainty’ – no
    answer”

    It was comprehensively addressed. That you failed to understand it is hardly a surprise.