h1

Will it be the English towns that decide it next time as well?

November 8th, 2011

Blair Freebairn looks back and looks forward

Thomas Huxley’s observation that many a beautiful theory was killed by an ugly fact is an often ignored truth. Back in 2007 on this site I theorised that the coming 2010 election was going to be decided not in cities, rural areas or Scotland, but in the English towns.

So what actually happened? Above are the 2010 results on a map distorted so that each constituency takes up roughly the same area. The seats that changed hands have light grey shading and a bold boundary while the seats that didn’t change hands but were close battles are marked with a blue buffered cross.

That the bulk of the action was in towns looks clear, but a proper answer needs a categorisation of constituencies. Scotland is, well, Scotland. A seat that has more than 60% of its population within the urban area of a city sprawl that itself has more than 150,000 total residents is called urban, rural constituencies are larger than 600 square kilometres, and towns are the rest. Here are the results of the 2010 election summarised using these classifications.

Town seats make up half of all seats, but represent three quarters of all seats that changed hands. Three times as many town seats changed hands as urban seats. The Conservatives achieved better swings in English towns than cities, a differential that won them maybe 10 extra seats.

The 2015 boundaries are still in a state of flux, but the patterns will repeat. For the outcome of the 2015 election Scotland, London and the core of our great cities will still be largely irrelevant containing few near-miss or recently acquired seats.

If David Cameron can hang onto his new conquests amongst the towns of Central and Southern England, and combine that with turning just a few of those Northern towns and suburban near-misses into wins then he will have his majority. Labour’s task is even simpler, win back those English towns.

All party strategists must still view their actions with the good folk of Luton, Grimsby and Telford in mind and not obsess over the London, ‘Northern’ or Scottish mafia.

For anyone who wants to explore the map in more detail I have a hi-res version poster size version of the map image that includes seat labels and data tables. It is available here And for the complete mapping gear-heads I have the underlying shape files also available for free download on the same page.

(Blair Freebairn is a geographer whose 2007 guest slot here was just about the best pointer to what would happen. It certainly shaped my thinking about the 2010 election – MS)




  • The Screaming Eagles

    Yes.

    With a lot of these cases, it feels that the burden of proof is on the employer to prove they aren’t guilty.

  • Anonymous

    “I’m going to bet on it ending up as a mess, namely that they reported what they were doing up to the home office but that it never made it up the ladder to May and so there’ll be much talk about clear chains of communication, bureaucracy and ultimately it’s no-one’s fault but plenty of commitments to improve things. ”

    I wouldn’t bet against that. It would be a travesty if it came to it though. Seldom has there been a more clear cut case. What do the documents signed off by ministers say, what did the officials actually do?

    Either the Home Sec. was truthful in her report to parliament or she wasn’t. No need for long enquiries, just publish the documents.

  • Anonymous

    According to the Guardian Clark is saying that the additional measures he authorised had been in place since 2008/9. If that’s right Cooper’s rant in the House yesterday may end up looking rather misplaced.

  • tim
  • MrsB

    Having read Corporeal and TSE and the esteemed Mr Herdson ….

    I would think he doesn’t have as strong a case as the one against Ed Balls, because IIRC Ed Balls sacked Sharon Shoosmith, but Clark was suspended pending an investigation, and resigned.

    BTW I do not recommend looking up the words “Balls” and “sack” as a search term on Google……

  • The Screaming Eagles

    For fans of Nigella Lawson.

    Contains some mild words in an order that maybe NSFW.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RtS2Ikk7A9I

  • http://twitter.com/MorrisF1 Morris Dancer

    Rather understandably given Italy and the Brodie story this isn’t the lead headline of the day, but it is quite an important story and well-worth reading:

    http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/7375183/the-worst-form-of-censorship.thtml

  • MrsB

    Showing 307 of 306 comments

    That’s a new disqus wrinkle!

  • Anonymous

    One minute Dave and George et al are involved in fiendishly clever Machiavellian plots involving Andy Coulson, the next the entire cabal of the government is as thick as mince. It doesn’t stack up, except in your feverish and under employed mind.

  • Anonymous

    “I think part of the point is that there appear not to have been minuted meetings”

    Sorry, Mrs B., but I am struggling with that one. Policies like the “Level 2″ border control procedures just can’t appear out of thin air, there has to be a paper trail and that has to lead back to ministers. I knew the Home Office fairly well, albeit before that days of Blair’s sofa government, and it is inconceivable that nobody in the chain of command made a note. It is also hard to believe that after all the fuss they made regarding Blair’s style that Conservative ministers would produce policy from undocumented discussions.

    No, sorry, there will be paperwork at Home Sec level downwards. It would take a competent investigator less than a week to turn it all up, if indeed it is not already to hand.

    Either May is an incompetent buffoon, who gobs off before checking the official record and, as I constantly remind delegates on the critical incident management courses I help run, if it ain’t written down it didn’t happen, or the man is pushing his luck hoping for a corporeal-style result.

  • Anonymous

    PB NightHawks thread – now up

  • Sunil Prasannan

    Yes, you can theoretically walk, or fly (as a bird) all the way from Cornwall to the Scottish borders and only travel through Tory constituencies.

  • Anonymous

    This seasonal offering from Nigella is better – and much more NSFW!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=2wncEeJZqzM

  • MrsB

    Mr Llama, I wish I had your faith in the system. My experience is: unread or unreplied-to emails, notes of meetings not written up properly or not agreed by all participants, ambiguous wordings (usually unintentional), stuff handled by junior staff who did not realise the need to escalate it, reliance on passive systems (being told if something goes wrong, not updated as a matter of course), people leaving and not passing on information, new staff arriving and it being assumed they know what to do. Etc. Etc. Etc.

  • Megalomaniacs4u

    Got 13/13 with two wild guesses

  • Anonymous

    The numbers are pretty amazing re: Cain. Could it be that he’s gonna survive current/future bimbo eruptions?

    Haven’t seen his press conference, but did catch some of his appearence last night on the Jimmy Kimmel Show. Where he looked and sounded pretty good.

    Cain may survive despite now being accused by a named person. BUT Cain’s campaign and GOPers in general spotlight their own achilles heel when they attack the woman’s lawyer (a celebrity it’s true but an attorney with a better track record in the courts than most PBer have at the track) rather than the substance.

    My guess is that Gloria Allred did a bit of basic fact checking before she signed up with her newest client, she’s very big on basic evidence as a TV judge, more so than most tele-magistrates.

  • Anonymous

    Great map and thanks for the links to it.